<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome Memory Usage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/google-chrome-memory-usage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/google-chrome-memory-usage/</link>
	<description>Richard Bradshaw&#039;s idea of what is interesting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:03:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eduardo</title>
		<link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/google-chrome-memory-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>Eduardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/09/02/google-chrome-memory-usage/#comment-450</guid>
		<description>Your test FAIL!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How much replications ? What is the criteria to use this workload ? Scientifically and experimentally and empirically FAIL at all points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your test FAIL!</p>
<p>How much replications ? What is the criteria to use this workload ? Scientifically and experimentally and empirically FAIL at all points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kompetisi Web Kompas MuDA IM3</title>
		<link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/google-chrome-memory-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Kompetisi Web Kompas MuDA IM3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/09/02/google-chrome-memory-usage/#comment-270</guid>
		<description>i love google, thanks for review and good article :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love google, thanks for review and good article <img src='http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ffxi gil</title>
		<link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/google-chrome-memory-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>ffxi gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/09/02/google-chrome-memory-usage/#comment-259</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing . really Google is good info. Best regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing . really Google is good info. Best regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beyond Today &#187; My Browser War (Firefox vs. Safari vs. Chrome vs. IE7)</title>
		<link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/google-chrome-memory-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Beyond Today &#187; My Browser War (Firefox vs. Safari vs. Chrome vs. IE7)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/09/02/google-chrome-memory-usage/#comment-258</guid>
		<description>[...] neat. There are even more articles on memory and browsers check and pros and cons of the multi-process model. Now back to will it replace my Firefox. Not at the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] neat. There are even more articles on memory and browsers check and pros and cons of the multi-process model. Now back to will it replace my Firefox. Not at the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deng</title>
		<link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/google-chrome-memory-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Deng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/09/02/google-chrome-memory-usage/#comment-255</guid>
		<description>Eminently an expound fact and,due to precision,an equitable experiment indeed and undoubtedly.A nirvana.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eminently an expound fact and,due to precision,an equitable experiment indeed and undoubtedly.A nirvana.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Offshore Gaming</title>
		<link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/google-chrome-memory-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Offshore Gaming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/09/02/google-chrome-memory-usage/#comment-228</guid>
		<description>I liked the browser so much so that I wanted to write a post in my language about it… searched the net and found your, which I translated and it’s there for my people to know about this great browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the browser so much so that I wanted to write a post in my language about it… searched the net and found your, which I translated and it’s there for my people to know about this great browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sér</title>
		<link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/google-chrome-memory-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Sér</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/09/02/google-chrome-memory-usage/#comment-219</guid>
		<description>Just did the same thing with Firefox 3.1a2 and it also uses only 30mb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just did the same thing with Firefox 3.1a2 and it also uses only 30mb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sér</title>
		<link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/google-chrome-memory-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Sér</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/09/02/google-chrome-memory-usage/#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Your test doesn&#039;t make any sense, my firefox is using only 34mb. I did the same thing as you, but I don&#039;t have opera and safari installed atm.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;IE 7.00.6000.16705 22,084k&lt;br&gt;Chromium 0.2.152.1 26,350k&lt;br&gt;Firefox 3.0.1 34,868k&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You MUST consider things like addons, history, etc. Maybe even how big your favorites list is.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, Google Chrome is a lot faster than Firefox. Yes, Google Chrome offers some nice features.  Nevertheless it&#039;s still in beta (like Gmail has been for too long time imo) and it&#039;s an very early stage of public development to say &quot;hey, it is faster!!&quot; or &quot;it uses less memory than that other browser&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your test doesn&#39;t make any sense, my firefox is using only 34mb. I did the same thing as you, but I don&#39;t have opera and safari installed atm.</p>
<p>IE 7.00.6000.16705 22,084k<br />Chromium 0.2.152.1 26,350k<br />Firefox 3.0.1 34,868k</p>
<p>You MUST consider things like addons, history, etc. Maybe even how big your favorites list is.</p>
<p>Yes, Google Chrome is a lot faster than Firefox. Yes, Google Chrome offers some nice features.  Nevertheless it&#39;s still in beta (like Gmail has been for too long time imo) and it&#39;s an very early stage of public development to say &#8220;hey, it is faster!!&#8221; or &#8220;it uses less memory than that other browser&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bradshaw</title>
		<link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/google-chrome-memory-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bradshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/09/02/google-chrome-memory-usage/#comment-210</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s how it&#039;s designed, each tab and plugin gets it&#039;s own process. That way, if one crashes it won&#039;t crash the whole browser.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Read this for more details: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/small_04.html&quot;&gt;http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/small_...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s how it&#39;s designed, each tab and plugin gets it&#39;s own process. That way, if one crashes it won&#39;t crash the whole browser.</p>
<p>Read this for more details: <a href="http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/small_04.html"></a><a href="http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/small_.." rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/small_..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syfer</title>
		<link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/google-chrome-memory-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Syfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/09/02/google-chrome-memory-usage/#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Would someone tell me why there are two or three processes for Chrome running on my PC? But over all it is fast, well with a GB of RAM it is bound to be fast :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would someone tell me why there are two or three processes for Chrome running on my PC? But over all it is fast, well with a GB of RAM it is bound to be fast <img src='http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
